Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections
Personal tools
Log in
You are here: Home Tax Cases Tax Cases Jerome Mirza & Associates, Ltd. v. United States
 

Jerome Mirza & Associates, Ltd. v. United States

The taxpayer, a professional corporation established by a well-regarded personal injury lawyer, established a defined benefit pension plan.

The consulting actuary assumed a 5% pre-retirement rate of return, used the unit credit actuarial cost method and assumed that the subject participant would retire at age 55.  The Internal Revenue Service challenged the validity of the unit credit actuarial cost method and the actuarial assumptions, and in particular, the 5% interest rate in light of the fact that the plan trustee had “locked in” fixed income rates of return in excess of the actuarially assumed 5% rate.  The case was the first of more than 1,500 defined benefit pension plans subjected to the Small Plan Audit Program, ultimately resolved in favor of the taxpayers and against the Internal Revenue Service.  882 F.2d 229 (7th Cir. 1989).

Files
Document Actions

Client Site Login         Legal Notice                            416 Main Street, Suite 400, Peoria, Illinois 61602   p. 309.680.8000